It would
be disingenuous of me to say I was born a
free-market capitalist. I actually didn’t advocate
for, nor understand that ideology until I was nearly
five. Let me describe my epiphany.
In my early years I lived with my parents and two
brothers on the family ranch 30 miles north of
Forsyth. One summer day, Mom cleaned us up and
hauled us to town for the Rosebud County Rodeo.
Being more accustomed to the open sagebrush plains
of eastern Montana than the big city, it was a bit
of a shock sitting in the bleachers surrounded by so
many people. During the slack time between
rough-stock events my wandering eyes spotted a kid
about my age scrambling under the bleachers
snatching empty beer bottles. Puzzled, I watched for
awhile before squirming between the seats and floor
boards and dropping to the ground to ask the
scavenger what he was doing. “The guy at the beer
stand gives me a dime for every case of empty
bottles I haul back to him,” the kid explained.
I quietly followed as he lugged a clattering case of
bottles from under the bleachers and sure enough,
the fellow at the beer stand tossed him a dime.
“Whoa Nellie,” I thought to myself. “I need in on
this action.” I grabbed an empty wooden case from
the stack and hustled under the bleachers. Within
minutes, I had filled my case and sprinted to the
beer stand. Sure enough, just as with the other kid,
the beer guy tossed me a dime and I stuffed it in my
pocket. This was great. Before long, I solicited the
aid of my two brothers and the three of us were
earning money as fast as skinny kids could run with
cases of beer bottles. With all of us working the
same bleachers, we soon developed real supply chain
problems; the rodeo fans simply weren’t emptying the
bottles fast enough. In the shadows under the
bleachers, we monitored the emptiness of each bottle
placed on the floorboards so we could grab them
before someone else did. Occasionally, we were a
little too quick and a gruff old cowboy would bark
and kick at us. Like flies on a road kill, we
hovered out of range until he placed his bottle down
again and then we would snatch it and run. It is
dangerous work being a freckle faced capitalist, but
at the end of the day I had a pocket full of
dimes—real dimes, because in 1962 dimes contained
0.08 ounces of silver making each one worth $2.80 on
today’s market.
If my grand kids crawled under the bleachers for a
similar business venture today they would first need
to fill out a W-4, an I-9, Workers’ Comp forms,
state child support notification form, plus produce
a Social Security card all to be told they couldn’t
hired because of child labor laws. Hasn’t society
progressed? Interestingly, if they were hired they
should be paid in nickels as 5 cents of every dime
needs to be sent to the state and federal government
for taxes. The above story is the perfect sedge-way
to today’s point concerning the costly growth of
state government. The budget is the hot topic of the
second half of the session, so let’s look at the
numbers.
For the 2001 biennium, Montana’s total budget was
5.4 billion dollars. By 2011, those two-year budgets
had grown to 10.1 billion dollars. This whopping
86.81 percent growth in government spending compares
to a Treasure State population growth of only 9.63
percent over the same time frame. This spending
increase added 1,811 new state employees with an
average annual wage and benefit package above
$60,000 each. When compared to Montana’s private
sector average wage of $44,000, this is simply not
sustainable. We must shrink government.
Our governor, along with other big government
advocates, argues Legislative Fiscal Division’s
revenue estimates are wrong and Montana has plenty
of money to fully fund every program. Their premise
is wrong. Spending money just because you have it is
exactly how state government has grown to its
monstrous size. Our budget should be no bigger than
that needed to minimally fund the smallest level of
state government as allowed by our constitution. At
this moment, Montana’s House is proposing to cut 7
percent from the last biennial budget. This is an
unprecedented, but desperately needed, shrinking of
government. We will never restore our economic
freedom if the fruits of our labors are continually
consumed by taxes. No one said freedom would be
easy; only worth it.
|